Monthly Archives: December 2012

Boxing Day Musings on ‘Staying Grand’

In the course of my business day, I hear the latest and trendiest of corporate jargon (phrases such as ‘let’s consider the optics of that‘ and ‘let’s get alignment on this‘ and ‘let’s drill down‘ and ‘let’s unpack this‘).  We are definitely corporate cool when it comes to language. So much so that my uber-swank workplace even calls a Powerpoint file a ‘deck‘ which I personally consider a lexicon-fail because the word continually yanks my brain back to the gruesomely analog 70s where I sit on a floor subjected to watching an endless array of slides of my aunt and uncle’s seemingly incessant vacations, the horrible photography made worse by the excruciating clatter of 35 mm slides as they drop and pop and more-often-than-not stick as the deck turns. But I digress. The above highlighted snippets of pretentious vocabulary are my top nominations for 2012 Newspeak … or they were until Christmas Eve.

On Christmas Eve, my husband and I attended a soiree after our church’s first annual (and incident-free) candle-lighting service at which the better half of FR sang a song he wrote some 30 years ago accompanied only by his adept guitar playing. It is a truly beautiful song which puts forward the notion that, between partying and socializing and gifting and re-gifting, it’s okay to say ‘happy birthday’ to Jesus at this time of year.

The church, which we have been attending since last August, is full of many wonderful, mostly retired people, including a nonagenarian general practitioner and his wife, whom I shall call TB and BB. We had the privilege of sitting with them at the after party, munching and chatting (as we had done once before at a local Tim Horton’s after church) and, when it was time to mingle, and we stood up to leave the table, TB told my husband to “stay grand” … huh? What was that? Stay grand? I must say it took some time for my ear-to-brain mechanism to reconcile what he said and what he meant.

By telling someone to ‘stay grand’, it means, in your eyes, they have achieved a level of grandness. Grand is not a word flashed about in normal conversation in 2012, or even in the last few decades for that matter, and is an adjective describing what is “impressive in size, appearance, or general effect; stately, majestic, or dignified in front of an audience; highly ambitious or idealistic; magnificent or splendid; and noble or revered.”

I always knew my husband was something special and indescribable in many ways. It has always taken me a myriad of words to describe all his wonderful attributes (as evidenced by his Christmas card that I crafted about this time yesterday) but TB considered the optics, drilled down, and unpacked that my husband is, in a word, grand. That is the word I’ve been searching for … for 14 years! Grand … it seems to me that using that word to describe someone can only come from one who really, really knows your heart and nature. How could TB, who has only met my husband twice, both times over coffee, come to such a conclusion that I couldn’t grasp myself in our years together? The Bible says we never know when we are entertaining angels and I’m starting to have a funny feeling about TB …

Now that I officially live in the shadow of bona fide grandness on a daily basis (and I do have my tongue firmly planted in cheek), albeit that he oftentimes goes around in sweats, unshaven and wearing his hair in a ponytail, I feel it incumbent upon myself to rise to the calling and stay grand myself. Jesus said in John 15:5, “… for without Me, you can do nothing”. So I cannot be grand … we cannot stay grand … without Him. As the song my husband sang on Christmas Eve boldly asks, “how ’bout you”?

Happy Birthday Jesus and Merry New Year to all!

Link to A Christmas Song here.

© Flagrant Regard, 2012

Advertisements
Categories: Bible Knowledge, Christianity, Creative Writing, Didactic, Illustration, Religion, Spiritual, Theology, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Human Fetus Gets Overnight ‘Status Update’ To Human Being

An open letter to pro-choice
advocates in light of recent events.


Okay, I’m really confused.

Pro-choicers, help me out here.

You rant and scream at your rallies, on your blogs, in your liberal-leaning newspaper columns and directly at your detractors that abortion – especially if performed on a woman prior to the 24-weeks-pregnant mark – is okay because the creature, the ‘it-thing’ inside that woman’s body is a fetus. ‘Fetus’, in your minds, being a word for a disposable type of developing life-form that’s not, in fact, a little human person.

Really? ‘Cause you wouldn’t know it today.

Every news server this morning broke the story that Kate Middleton, the internationally admired, beloved Dutchess and wife of the future king of England is about 12 weeks pregnant.

Websites have already been created in homage to the ‘baby-to-be’, throngs of royal-watchers are passionately discussing what the baby’s name might be if it’s a boy or a girl, women everywhere are gushing and/or vicariously ‘glowing’ over, with or for Kate Middleton in anticipation of the newly expected ‘child’ who will be 3rd in line to the royal throne (as if he/she had the job in hand already).

For nearly a full 10 minutes on the CTV National Evening News all my wife and I witnessed was intense focus, hope and expectation surrounding a human being who has yet to become, well, a ‘human being’ according to you, the pro-choice supporters.

So if I am understanding this correctly, a woman has the right to call something growing inside her a “zygote, blastocyst, embryo, or fetus” (thank you for the terminology, Pro-Choice Action Network) and then rip it out of her body if she believes it to be anything less than a prince or princess in the making?

50 shades of hypocrisy at work here, maybe? How many of you pro-choice advocates are up in arms over Kate Middleton’s fetus being regarded as – elevated to the status of – not just a valuable ‘human being’ but to royalty – at 12 weeks! How many of you plan to march around the streets of London shouting, “Don’t you people (the majority population) dare call this thing inside Ms. Middleton a child yet, you’ll ruin our cause and our case against pro-lifers who say that the fetus inside that woman is actually a human baby worthy of esteem and life.”

Is it not fairly clear, especially amidst these present and widely publicized circumstances, that something amiss with respect to your staid and sacrosanct pro-choice perspective?

How many of you would readily admit that you got a tad misty-eyed or even excited for Kate Middleton when you heard she was expecting a child? Or conversely, how many of you got upset – planned to vilify the media – the second you heard the term ‘baby’ or ‘child’ being bandied about in the news as if it was a given that it was indeed a child inside pregnant Kate Middleton?

Let me help you with some headlines and/or placards for your next rally, march or blog posts so that you can suppress or end this nonsense about a ‘baby’ being carried by Kate Middleton and continue on your merry way deciding what is worthy of being called human life and what is not.

Feel free to borrow from me these anti pro-life statements for your protesting outside Kate Middleton’s hospital room in London:

“KATE, PLEASE DON’T CALL IT A BABY – WAIT TILL WEEK 24 PLEASE”

“IT’S NOT A CHILD YET, KATE, FEEL FREE TO ABORT IT FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER 84 DAYS”

And here’s some blog-post headings or news-article headlines that might suit your purposes:

“KATE MIDDLETON’S FANS ARE FOOLS – STOP TALKING ‘BABY’ YOU PEOPLE, IT’S JUST A FOETUS!”

“ZYGOTES ARE NOT TO RECEIVE RECOGNITION AS CHILDREN, EVEN IF THEY ARE ROYAL ZYGOTES”

“THE EMBRYO INSIDE KATE MIDDLETON’S BODY IS NOT HUMAN!”

But you don’t have it in you to put such raw headlines/statements out there do you?

Seriously, then where do you go in your heads?   Do pro-choice supporters flippantly chime together, “Well, it’s okay if a ton of folks (including Kate Middleton) think that there’s a baby in her womb as long as we know and maintain that that’s a lie.”  Really?  You’re just going to ‘let it slide’ are you? … all the ‘baby-lovin’ currently going on when there’s no baby to speak of yet?  You’re okay with that?  If so, it really does beg the question, “Just how sure are you of where you stand (or how strong are your convictions) concerning the value of an unborn human life or when that tiny life truly begins?

I say that if you really believed your own tripe about human life only beginning at the 24 week mark (and I’m aware that some of your proponents even consider the moment of birth the definitive ‘do not murder’ point on the human fetus time-line), you’d all be out in force trying to put an end to this ubiquitous joy, reverence and excitement surrounding one little life, no matter whose life it happens to be or happens to be inside of.

Maybe it’s time many of you examined your position and humbly recognized how much you really don’t believe what you have been told or have fought for for so long.

May God give you wisdom, not as this world gives, but as He gives it, to see the truth and sanctity of life – be it royal or rejected.

Pro-Life

© Flagrant Regard 2012
Full permission is granted by the writers to reprint and/or repost any or all portions of this blog-post. 

Categories: Abortion, Abortion Issue, Apologetics, Religion, Uncategorized | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Blog at WordPress.com.